Responsibility to protect : Pillar 3 the political agenda behind the military intervention in Syria

Abstract

This thesis delves into the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, specifically focusing on Pillar three. Pillar three presents the greatest challenge among the components of the doctrine, as it grants authorization for the use of force and involves the delicate balance between safeguarding human rights and interfering in states' sovereignty. The research investigates the influence of political dynamics within the permanent five members of the UN Security Council on the adoption of resolutions pertaining to military intervention. The primary objective is to cultivate a well-informed and balanced discussion regarding the challenges associated with the inconsistency and political influence that arise during the operationalization of RtoP in a continuously evolving global context. Additionally, the study examines the impact of veto power on the humanitarian situation within the current world order, with a specific focus on Syria as a case study. To fulfill this objective, several analyses and literature sources have been consulted and employed to examine diverse perspectives on the doctrine and its implementation, particularly concerning Syria.